Written Answer to PQ on Career Conversion Programmes
NOTICE PAPER NO. 237 OF 2025 FOR SITTING ON 4 NOVEMBER 2025
QUESTION NO. 846 AND 847 FOR ORAL ANSWER
MP: Ms Rachel Ong
To ask the Minister for Manpower (a) what regulatory safeguards, if any, are in place in Career Conversion Programmes to prevent the inclusion of unfair contractual terms requiring trainees to pay liquidated damages when termination is initiated by the employer; and (b) how will the Government ensure that employers do not recover from trainees more than the actual training costs incurred by them under the programmes.
To ask the Minister for Manpower whether the Government will consider (i) establishing clear guidelines on prohibited contractual terms in Career Conversion Programmes to safeguard trainees in employer-initiated terminations, (ii) ensuring that trainees are informed of these guidelines and (iii) providing trainees with access to advice on the fairness of employer-set terms, especially where contractually liquidated damages exceed programme fees or appear disproportionate to training costs.
Answer:
We are committed to safeguarding the interests of Career Conversion Programme (CCP) trainees. Companies that are successfully onboarded to CCPs typically have progressive workplace practices and demonstrate a genuine commitment to supporting individuals in their career transitions. Companies that are found to be engaging in egregious practices will be suspended from participating in CCPs.
2. While companies may have legitimate reasons to terminate a contract and seek liquidated damages (LD) in certain cases such as those involving misconduct, they should not seek refunds from trainees for costs in excess of what the companies have incurred. Government subsidies should be explicitly excluded from the calculation of LD to ensure that the total amount recovered by the employer will not exceed their actual expenditure, net of Government subsidies.
3. Trainees who believe that they have been subject to unreasonable employment clauses may seek assistance from their unions, the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices, or the Ministry of Manpower.